The table below gives information about consumers spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002.
The table compares the percentage of spending in 3 categories in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in 2002.
Overall, Turkey's spending was the highest overall in 2002. All countries spent the most on food/drinks/tobacco while the least spending can be seen in leisure and education.
In terms of food/drinks/tobacco, Turkey spent the most at 32.14%. The spending of Ireland was also high at 28.91% as compared to Sweden, which spent the lowest, at 15.77%. Spain and Italy's expenditure was 18.80% and 16.36% respectively.
With regard to clothing/footwear, the highest spender was Italy at 9% while Sweden spent the lowest. The expenditure of Turkey, Spain and Ireland was relatively the same at approximately 6.5%.
Leisure and education comprised the smallest spending in all countries at just under 5%. While Turkey's spending was about 1% bigger than that of Sweden and Italy at 4.35%, Ireland and Spain's figures were approximately 50% of Turkey's expenditure.
- Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has the technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 61
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
- The table below gives information about consumers spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002. 61
- The chart below displays the shares of expenditure on selected categories in the United States, Canada, the UK and Japan in 2009. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...othing/footwear, the highest spender was Italy at 9% while Sweden spent the lowes...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46405228758 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27454241827 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0542331922 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100911374262 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517735375638 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500380707068 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771336923586 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562646446632 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.