Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is claimed by some that if teachers received feedbacks or criticisms from their students, the quality of education could be enhanced. On the contrary, there is a notion that respect and discipline in a class would be threatened if teachers allow children to assess their educators. In my opinion, I agree with both the former and the latter.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why giving high school students the liberty in expressing their thoughts and feelings to teachers could better educational quality. Firstly, level of comprehension of learners would not just base on the content of lessons, it also counts on the way teachers inspire students. For instance, teachers may teach too fast so their student can not follow, however, thanks to learners’ responds, teachers could adjust their speeds and methods so that students would fully retain knowledge. Secondly, with detailed comments from students, mutual understanding between teachers and students could greatly increase. Therefore, the teachers could explore what is the optimal approach to captivate learners in their lesson.
On the other hand, students given permission to evaluate their teachers could carry the lack of respect and discipline in classrooms. The first explanation is that students are immature and inexperienced, they could not control their behaviors in some cases and easily give numerous negative words or even severe criticism to teachers, who strives to help them mature day by day. It could lead to teachers’ vulnerability and impair their morale in teaching. Moreover, classes tend to be in chaos because of massive comments. Manifold opinions from students could put teachers under pressure since pleasing all students is impossible. For instance, there are 25 students in a class which means daily after school time, teachers will receive 25 different judgments included negative words. It is absolutely an overload for them.
In conclusion, from my viewpoint, giving children the right to display their real emotions could positive influence educational quality to some extent, nevertheless, it need to be taken into account seriously due to a number of drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-13 | MinhJoyluv | 87 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | thanh1927540 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 67 | view |
- Some parents should spend time on reading or telling stories to children, while others thinks that children can read through a variety of sources such as books, TV and Internet by themselves. Discuss both view and give opinion. 78
- Studies show that criminals get low level of education. Some people believe that the best way to reduce the crime is educating people in prison so they can get a job after leaving prison. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 61
- Studies show that criminals get low level of education. Some people believe that the best way to reduce the crime is educating people in prison so they can get a job after leaving prison. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The chart below shows the number of male and female research students studying six-related subjects at a UK university in 2009 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee with both the former and the latter. On the one hand, there are several reaso...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in some cases, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46470588235 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83662862175 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7627313333 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.875 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174506448703 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608527130458 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442774060086 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104423483504 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421391687615 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.