Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In these days, the popularity of holding meetings and training via Internet is increasing dramatically. I would concede that although this trend does come with some adverse effects, yet the benefits created by it far eclipse the disadvantages.
On the one hand, this tendency certainly exerts a detrimental implication to participants. Firstly, in all likelihood, there are a number of people finding it difficult to utilize technology. The reason could be that they can not keep track of the latest software so they struggle to make use of them . For example, to elder staffs, it would take them a wide amount of time to understand and get use to modern programs. Secondly, connection would not always be guaranteed during meetings, which could affect the effectiveness of discussions immensely. Truly, because of disruption, participants could lose track of progress of meetings, as a result, there would be some misunderstanding or confusion.
There are, however, some dazzling advantages of online meetings can easily overshadow the disadvantages of that. The first plus point is that it helps people save both time and money. For instance, in the past, to meet colleagues working in other branches along a country, members of a company had to make long and expensive trips, but now, thanks to the development of technology, they can interact with each other without commuting long distances. Moreover, files can be updated and even modified immediately without any delay in online discussions. The fact is that people can share presentation and information conveniently to all other members, who join the conference within a minute, then they could give back comments, therefore, the quality of the presentation could be enhanced.
In conclusion, from my perspective, there are more advantages than disadvantages to organize online meetings. Thus, this tendency should be encouraged continuously in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | wardiati | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Tt617 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | phanduydat | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | phanduydat | 11 | view |
- Scientists tell us that some activities are good for health and others are bad. Despite knowing that, millions of people still continue doing unhealthy activities. What are the causes and what are the solutions for this? 84
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the facuties of a major university in 2012 78
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2020 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport. 73
- The two maps below shw an island, before and after the constrction of some tourist dacilities 78
- The civic centre will be planned to change There are two maps one is the existing and the other is the plan for new 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...are so they struggle to make use of them . For example, to elder staffs, it would ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4219269103 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11969913555 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2677096268 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100067410396 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036430424937 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589381495728 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680605489686 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469311063834 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.