Nowadays more and more people have access to the Internet. But constant availability of any information worsens people's memory and critical thinking skills.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern society, computer technology and the Internet have penetrated into all spheres of human’s life. Every day many people gain connection to the network, but it has bad impact on user’s brains. Although I agree that, large amount of information negatively affect memory and independent opinion, I strongly believe that, in the current world live without the internet is impossible to imagine.
On the one hand, massive volume of information certainly results in negative it consequence. An internet content is capable of shaping public opinion and changing user’s mind as well as destroying their memory. For example, my friend John missed his own opinion on a number of issues because information from the internet changed his mind. John used to be supporter of the labor party, but now he is a follower of the communists. Thus, the internet can be a powerful weapon in the hands of propagandists.
On the other hand, modern live impossible without internet, because the Internet has entered every home and all industries of modern society. Computers with the internet connection is available in every location such as hospitals, schools, shops, banks and police. For example, a few days ago I meet homeless person who asked passersby for a money and used payment terminal with an internet connection. Hence, access to the internet become a vital part of our life as well as water supply, electricity and heating.
It is difficult to imagine how humanity can live without the Internet, but the same time many people understand that through the network exist a plausibility to manipulate a public opinion. Even though nowadays everyone need access to the Internet for every day activity, negative impact of huge amount information on people’s brains is more important than other abilities due to the reasons mentioned in my essay.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-22 | KEVA | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 51 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | nicktyranov | 82 | view |
- Fossil fuels are essential for producing electricity powering industry and fueling transportation However one day we will reach a point when all the world s fossil fuels have been depleted How can we conserve these resources What are some alternatives to 84
- Some people think that couples should live together before getting married to start knowing each other better and see if they are compatible Others say that because of this tendency people become immoral and only deep emotional attachment makes a durable 81
- Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects instead of some specific subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint 67
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- Some people think that it is important to have a single language as an international official language. Others think that it will make it difficult to identify countries and would cause a loss of culture.What are your opinions on this? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ibility to manipulate a public opinion. Even though nowadays everyone need acces...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for everyday'?
Suggestion: for everyday
...ys everyone need access to the Internet for every day activity, negative impact of huge amoun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, thus, well, for example, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21262458472 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85706945745 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1516074381 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166585641441 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529856439962 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372567863386 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104908721659 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434401617144 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.