It is said that "Not everything that is learned is contained in books".
Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is undoubtedly believed that not all things are learned from books, people also gain knowledge from their personal experience. In my opinion, I do believe that people learn the true meaning of life and the way to handle all the situation from practical experiences.
Books are the primary source of knowledge and enhance the horizon. They are used in schools as a primary source of knowledge for students. The help to provide information on various aspects such as history, political science, geography and worldly affairs. They aid in enhancing erudition and creativity of people. Moreover, they help in building proficiency in English language and people can read books at the comfort of their home. To exemplify, young generation will gain the knowledge of basic English grammar, historical and national events, basics of mathematics by reading books in schools.
However, the knowledge that a person gains from their experience is most valuable than that from books. Books just provide the theoretical data to people they do not educate people on how to tackle a difficult situation. Through personal experience person gain the wisdom to handle the situation smartly and contributes in the success in future. To elucidate, great basket ball players have not become successful in their sports by learning the rules in the books instead, they became expert though the practical experience they gained while playing the sport.
In my opinion, I vehemently agree that the knowledge and expertise a person gain from practical experience is more precious as compared to books. Books just provide the basic understanding, but how to apply it in situation is learned through experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | Prabhp | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Prabhp | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | Sarab.rathor4@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | akbarandarz | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | akbarandarz | 61 | view |
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online.Is this a positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.Write at least 250 wo 73
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and researchDisc 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or to try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job.Write a letter to this friend. In your letter:•say why 73
- Write a letter to an English speaking friend. In your letter:•explain why you changed jobs•describe your new job•tell him/her your other newsWrite at least 150 words.You do NOT need to write your own addresses.Begin your letter as follows: 70
- Some argue that film and television are a waste of time, because they do not have a direct connection with people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... smartly and contributes in the success in future. To elucidate, great basket ball player...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27777777778 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76103845198 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525925925926 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.181224679 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.785714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281826513642 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108222925627 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951174059923 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192089028455 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449465209218 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.