tpo 34 sea cows' extinctions
The reading and the listening are both about extinction of an specious from a place near Bering island off the coast of Siberia. Whereas the penman of the reading states that there are 3 possible causes for the extiction of Steller, the orator suggests that we can not have an apt conclusion for the matter due to the lack of suitable information. The lecturer cast doubt on 3 main points made in the reading passage by providing 3 theories.
First of all, the writer claims that over hunting of the local people, who were dependant to Steller as the main source of food, caused to extinction. The lecturer views this issue from an opposite angel. he says, this special type of sea cow was enormous in size and number. Consequenty, he argues that this size for the animal resulted for the small number of native people to disability of hunting all of them.
The second point offered by the author is that changes in ecosystem of the location caused to deficiency of food sources, that was a type of sea plant, for the Steller. On the other hand, the speaker believes that it is not a convenience hypothetical. Hence, he adds that, if changes of condition caused to death of Kelps, we must see this fact about other types of marines in the same place but we didn't.
Finally, the writer pf the passage believes that the main reason for this extiction is the hunters from Europe who killed the animal to gian fur of them. On the other hand, the professor illustrates that there is problem in the time of these two event. Moreover, he thinks that the European people started coming to the island after a great lost in the number of Steller, maybe hundred years after the aforamentioned extiction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | jeffhjz | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Christine hanna | 60 | view |
- Independent writing TPO 51 3
- Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher Others think that it is always better to have a teacher Which do you prefer Use specific reasons to develop your essay 88
- TOP29 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, e-mail, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 76
- Which would you choose: a high-paying job with long hours that would give you little time with family and friends or a lower-paying job with shorter hours that would give you more time with family and friends? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... listening are both about extinction of an specious from a place near Bering islan...
^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...iews this issue from an opposite angel. he says, this special type of sea cow was ...
^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: enormous
... says, this special type of sea cow was enormous in size and number. Consequenty, he argues that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...pes of marines in the same place but we didnt. Finally, the writer pf the passage b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, whereas, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62582781457 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44862120399 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539735099338 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4448101463 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.461538462 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311497574013 0.272083759551 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939531837001 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738367545667 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165909768818 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571925819028 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.