Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the importance of the role which friendship plays in our lives. We would be so lonely without our friends; therefore, we should appreciate our friendships. There are a number of people who hold the view that it is important to maintain our friendship over a long time even we do not have many friends, whereas others are inclined toward the opinion that it is more important to have the ability to make many new friends easily. Nevertheless, I concur with the former group's opinion. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on the reasons substantiating my point of view.
To begin with, I assert that old friendships are severely valuable; therefore, we should maintain them no matter what. We can count on our friends in many challenging situations, and we can solve our problems with the help of them. There are few people who help you through your difficulties; therefore, you should recognize those people and appreciate them as much as you can. Sometimes, even your parents can not help you because the problem may be too complicated. In these circumstances, you can get help from your very close friends. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Many years ago, when I was driving to my sister's school in order to peak her up, I had an unfortunate accident. I could not call my mom since I knew she could be worry, so I called one of my friends and asked her to peak my sister from her school. If I had called my mother, she would have been panicked. Consequently, one of my oldest friends helped me in this situation. I could not ask a new friend to do such a favor to me.
Another equally important reason which I think deserves some word is that it takes a while to trust someone. Therefore, when you make a new friend, you can not trust him immediately. In the modern era, people do not tell their mysteries to others easily, let alone to a new friend. Accordingly, our old friendships are worth so much since we know them, and we can trust them.
Considering all the reasons mentioned above, one could conclude that it is better to maintain our friendships with a small number of people rather than making lots of new friends. There are some benefits associated with it. We can rely on them in our difficulties, and we can trust them and tell them our secrets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in today’s world have become too dependent on automobiles. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the...
^^^^
Line 1, column 509, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
... Nevertheless, I concur with the former groups opinion. In the subsequent paragraphs, ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asons substantiating my point of view. To begin with, I assert that old friends...
^^^^
Line 2, column 761, Rule ID: I_AM_WORRY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worried'?
Suggestion: worried
...t call my mom since I knew she could be worry, so I called one of my friends and aske...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a new friend to do such a favor to me. Another equally important reason which I...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e we know them, and we can trust them. Considering all the reasons mentioned ab...
^^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...better to maintain our friendships with a small number of people rather than making lots of new f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, while, i think, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 80.0 43.0788530466 186% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57040572792 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72153612953 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501193317422 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4345874635 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2608695652 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2173913043 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47826086957 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244164834063 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711990090412 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844031311931 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166247409113 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499356938434 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.