viewers
The author concludes that they lose their viewers since the program is allocated more time to national news and less time to weather and local news. Thus, to attract the viewers they turn over the time devoted to local news and weather to its previous level. This argument as it now stands may seem logical, however, it is unconvincing because the conclusion relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence and it contends poorly defined vocabulary which makes it hard to understand.
First, the writer presupposes that just more time devoted to national news causes viewers to do not see this program. This argument does not contain any other variables reasons to loss the viewers such as the time of the program that it may have the effect on this problem since their viewers may sleep earlier at night or they do not use the strong and professional program presentation. Furthermore, maybe the person who presents the news does not have an oratorical expression.
Second, The statement contends that local businesses cancel their contract with them because of this issue. However, it could be other factors that make them do this. What if it is because they do not see more effort from them to express better advertising theme.
In conclusion, this argument suffers from poorly defined vocabulary and lacks strong evidence.
It turns upon the unstated presuppositions such as assuming that just the proportion of the time devoted to local news has decreased cause the problem and if they change the time quota local news can solve the problem. To solve the problem and taking the best decision in this situation they should precisely collect all the factors that can be the cause of the problem and then determine the effect of them on the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | tomlee0205 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Dinesh4518 | 64 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | aryaman | 58 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | searchinglife06 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 16 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 40 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 299 350
No. of Characters: 1440 1500
No. of Different Words: 147 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.158 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.816 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.431 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 96 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 77 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 40 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.917 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.736 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.917 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.37 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.679 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.167 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mine the effect of them on the problem.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, then, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.6327345309 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 28.8173652695 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 2260.96107784 66% => OK
No of words: 299.0 441.139720559 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99331103679 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5041123435 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 204.123752495 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491638795987 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 705.55239521 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5431897471 57.8364921388 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 119.503703932 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 23.324526521 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.70786347227 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149978297895 0.218282227539 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634693211437 0.0743258471296 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910443724263 0.0701772020484 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786455197677 0.128457276422 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989049761529 0.0628817314937 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.3799401198 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.3550499002 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 98.500998004 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.