Some people believe that robots will play an important role in future societies, while others argue that robots might have negative effects on society.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The quality and risks of robotics for the future of human life continues to be a controversial topic in the modern age of globalization. There are valid arguments on both sides of this very topical debate.
On the one hand, opponents of robots point to the threat to jobs that might be taken over by robots and robotics in the near future, consequently leading to fewer career opportunities for humans. According to the Economist magazine, it is predicted that more than 5 million jobs will be stolen by intelligent machines by 2030. This trend has been begun by several international large companies such as Amazon at which receiving and packing items and merchandises are done via robots filling job vacancies that could be thousands of positions for the unemployed. Furthermore, those who oppose the negative role of machine intelligence in man's societies highlight its disadvantages to education, especially for children. They say that being good at making homework, doing calculations, and solving problems, robots might be exploited by students of future generations with the intention of taking advantage of them, causing creative thinking vanished. Therefore, critics believe that the intrusion of robots and robotics will impinge our societies and can be fatal and destructive not only to our economy but also to our education system.
By contrast, supporters of the artificial intelligence-driven robots believe that they can be benevolent and useful to our societies. Firstly, this is because the health care system is much more likely to enjoy robots in such areas as surgery, elderly care, and even treating some mental disorders. For example, robots are being used in therapy sessions for autistic children. Secondly, proponents also highlight the role of robots in saving a large amount of manual labor, ranging from performing open-heart surgeries to milking cows. This appears to minimize the risks of putting humans into not only a hazardous environment but also a great deal of effort as well. Finally, advocates reject the idea of the detrimental role of robots in education, saying that robot-assistance teachers will enter schools and assist pupils to improve their academic performance.
In conclusion, although robots have both positive and negative, considering being a double-edged sword for humanity, it appears that its disadvantages are outweighed by the advantages, provided that using this highly advanced technology in favor of the whole world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | ahmadrava88 | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-23 | arianamirkiai | 84 | view |
- ‘The best way to educate children is by using the Internet in every lesson.’To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children? 89
- The table shows the number of foreign visitors (in millions) to 7 countries. 67
- Some people feel that public money should not be spent on cultural amenities such as museums, theatres and art festivals. How important do you think these things are to society as a whole? Are there any areas which are more important for the government to 78
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 78
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chnology in favor of the whole world.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42159383033 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03264771685 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601542416452 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4171840849 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.6 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9333333333 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213702120224 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726109206132 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396188433692 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123978681758 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421454455146 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.