Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this changed improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Imagine what fun if one could have an American breakfast, a Chinese lunch, and an Indian dinner! It would be a gourmet’s paradise! Modern life has drastically changed food patterns. These days preparation of food has become easier and faster due to the new gadgets as well as the availability of pre-cooked foodstuff. This change has improved the way people live as it has helped to save time as well as enhanced the quality of food.
Because of both spouses working, there is a little time left for elaborate cooking daily. Pre-cooked foods that need a minimum of heating or cooking are a great convenience. Time saved in the kitchen can be used for children, other household chores, entertainment, etc.
Packaged food has to adhere to strict norms of hygiene and has to get approval from a governmental/private organization. It would help a consumer to choose whether he wants food with protein/carbohydrate/fats content. The calorie content would also help him decide which is suitable for his family. Food is a source of pleasure as well as a basic requirement. So a balanced diet is essential for the family. Packaged and pre-cooked food also gives us a wide choice of cosines so without having to spend much time learning to cook them.
With new technology, the cooking and preserving of food have become easier and faster. Various gadgets like the microwave oven and food processor. Which has simplified and facilitated the process of cooking? Deep freezers and refrigerators help to preserve food for a long period, so a variety is always available at one’s fingertips. A visit to the well-stocked, well-displayed food store is both a visual gastronomically delight.
Modern technology and methods of cooking have improved the quality of life. It has helped save time, improved health and hygiene, provided a great variety that is always available. This can be seen as a minor revolution, which is a boon for gourmands and gourmets. So now one can eat to live as well as life to eat.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | Pandalove | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | prayashpathak | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | Emn96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | mike.sharko | 66 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | khosrow nouroozi | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement people should sometimes do things they do not enjoy doing? Use specific reasons and answer to support your reason. 60
- Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Some people spend their entire lives in one place. Others move a number of times throughout their lives, looking for better jobs, houses, communities, or even climate. Which do you prefer staying in one place or moving in search of another place? Use reas 66
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown what would you change Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...rastically changed food patterns. These days preparation of food has become easier a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98214285714 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18807101061 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550595238095 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6588217708 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7142857143 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7619047619 5.45110844103 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162001963321 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507553206625 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633320277248 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966740089832 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065992937277 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.