TPO 53 Task 1
Both the reading and the lecture are talking about the results of the determination of higher tax for cigarette and junk foods, which are unhealthy for individuals. The reading bring up three outcomes, which is beneficial for people and government, while the lecture refutes them and states that this reason are not rational.
First of all, the reading claims that the taxes could prevent people from using cigarette and unhealthy food. In contrast, the lecturer reject this reason and says that this cause people use cheaper cigarette that is much more harmful for them than that one they usually use, causing greater risk, consequently. Moreover, it results in people spend much money for unhealthy products, having less money to allocate to their health.
Secondly, the text assert that this type of tax is beneficial in terms of finance.
Thirdly, the reading brings up that the taxes collected by this way could be use in improving different services like educational, medicals, to name but a few. However, the lecturer contradicts this idea by stating that it could easily make the government dependent on it, which results in the government does not pursue new policies to earn money in order to improve other services.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-19 | negarborhani | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Sarrraaa | 3 | view |
- TPO 53 Task 2 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, in contrast, talking about, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 202.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16336633663 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54590248224 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1644653539 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.375 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.75 7.06452816374 237% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.