The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
The charts represent the average proportions of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars consumed by the Americans in their meals which can cause health problems if eaten more than required.
Overall, it is clear that people in the USA consumes significant amount of sodium and saturated fat in their dinner whereas in terms of sugar, it is highly present in their snacks.
As the charts show, the amount of sodium is relatively higher in dinner than other meals which is 43%. Surprisingly, snacks and breakfast both have the equal percentage of sodium in them, at 14%. Similarly, people also take a high rate of saturated fat from their dinner which accounts for 37% while only 16% of this nutrient is present in their breakfast.
With regards to added sugar, it is extremely rich in snacks than other meals which represents 43%. However, unlike other meals, this figure is relatively lower in dinner which is 23%. Lastly, the proportion of sugar in breakfast and lunch is quite similar which is 16% and 19% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-25 | appollo abu | 78 | view |
- It's generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both ideas by giv 61
- The table below gives information about UK independent films Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 21
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present.Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 11
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Food travels thousands of miles from farmers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for our environment and economy if people consumed locally produced foods.To what extent do the advantages of this would outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, lastly, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9710982659 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52033727305 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57225433526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8746081485 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126997534529 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640435836642 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543453300924 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824322142781 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533162729445 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.