The map below shows the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
The two maps below demonstrate a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 and compare its road access. Based on the first map, in the 2007, there was only one access road to the hospital but after 3 years, some infrastructure was added around the hospital.
As it can be observed in the 2007, there was a place for car park where both staff and public were using of it. beside from this, bus stops were located at the both side of Hospital road.
According to the second map, bus station relocated to the west side of Hospital road where simultaneously was connected to the both roundabout in the Hospital road. I n one hand, north of this road, roundabout connects bas station, Ring road and Hospital road and in the other hand, it connects city road to bas station and Hospital road.
The other thing worthy of mentioning is car park place which was doubled and separated for public and staff. As it can be observed public can park their vehicle at the east side of the Ring road which is shaped square surround city hospital and the old car park was used by staff.
- Government should spend money to encourage the development of sport and art for school students, rather than supporting professional sports and art performances for the general public.Do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion. 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE. IN 20 YEARS LATER THERE WILL BE FEWER CAR IN USE? 66
- As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high. Archaeo 3
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and way of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47448979592 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29791296579 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8773953904 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.625 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39017474735 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198964649058 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185286348661 0.0843802449381 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245785392749 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181620707204 0.0819641961636 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.