do you agree or disagree with the following statement? it is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Whether keeping old friends or seeking for new ones have been a matter of argumentation for a long time. On one hand, some people think that keeping old friends is beneficial since these friendships will last for ever. On the other hand, the aficionados of finding new relationships support this idea that it will definitely be more beneficial for their future. Although maintaining the frindship with old friends is more accepted and pleasant among people, personally, I uphold with the idea of finding new friends because it can be more useful in my life. The answer of this question through my point of view in threefold. In the following, I will elaborate my solid proofs for this convoluted question.
First, having new friends and building new relationships can be useful for an individual inasmuch as he or she can benefit from new ideas which are generated from that friendship. For instance, when I was studying my master's in IUST university, I fraternized with one of my seniors'. Sequentially, we aimed to fund our own company; therefore, we had worked together for about two years, which was financially beneficial for both of us. This benefit was concluded from developing a whole new friendship, which was a great experience for me.
Second, building new friendships and relations can be profitable through the lens of political issues. For example, there was a seasoned engineer in our family who was very good and professional at developing new friends. Once, he planned to nominate for a senior management role in the city. Since he had diverse friends, he was easily elected owing to the fact that his friends voted for him.
Finally, socializing is considered as one of the healthiest actions for elderly people. The more a person socialize and find new friends, the less mental illnesses he/ she will have. My grandmother, for example, has not been a social person in her life, so she suffers from alzymer in her 80's. On the other hand, her sister has many retired friends to whom she speaks at least four hours a day; therefore, she fills no pain neither physically nor mentally.
In conlusion, having more friends ( as an action of socializing) have a preponderance of values for individuals. It will help people to develop their work financially and politically. Moreover, it will benefit their own bodies insomuch as socializing can prevent or at least postpone mental problems. However, this issue is really complex and one can not fully jugde about it. We can both have our old friends and have new ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Machli | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | wuttichai.v | 70 | view |
- TPO 12 independent focusing on one thing is better than knowing basic things about diverse majors 90
- leadership naturally or acquied 76
- elephants behavior 78
- TPO 17 independent agree or not most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are 76
- quickly changing world makes people happier or not 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... In conlusion, having more friends as an action of socializing have a prepo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, at least, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96487119438 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81075133059 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52224824356 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6848736573 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1739130435 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5652173913 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.39130434783 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152209536089 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503028509254 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563217632592 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917728929189 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478680622132 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.