When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Financial compensation is a highly essential factor that employee should consider before accepting a job. Although monthly payment is one of the reasons people working. However, I believe that performing the job in a safe environment is the most crucial aspect.
Plenty of reasons describe why wages play an important role in terms of selecting a job. First of all, people work to meet their daily necessity such as to pay accommodations and household expenses. Therefore, well-paid jobs are required to ensure their prosperities. Secondly, many families have a sole-money maker having responsibility for all family members. In Indonesia for instance, many households are economically dependent on the head of families. This makes those who responsible financially ought to carry out the economically profitable job.
Nevertheless, other aspects are highly essential to be put into account prior to accepting the job. Firstly, people should think about workplace security as this can affect their safety. High-rise-window washers, for example, receive high salaries but this profession is risk to cost their life. Secondly, people should think about whether workplaces are the best place to develop their skills and become a better person. The good working environment is where it is occupied by the people motivating and supporting each other. As a result, a worker could be a well-developed personality as well as having a trusted colleague.
To sum up, I believe that monthly payment is an important factor that people should consider while receiving the jobs since they have many responsibilities. However, the most essential factors a worker should taking into consideration is their safety and self-development.
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st Century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates. What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions. 73
- The circular chart reveals the four main courses of land degradation and the tobular chart illustrates the different regions during the year of 1990. It shows the percentum. 78
- The graph and chart below give information about the number of new graduates and theiremployment in the UK from 1992 to 2002. 67
- The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extend do you agree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...should consider before accepting a job. Although monthly payment is one of the reasons p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 475, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a responsible'.
Suggestion: who is a responsible
... the head of families. This makes those who responsible financially ought to carry out the econ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56226415094 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18014935917 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611320754717 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.5079105338 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.7058823529 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5882352941 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8823529412 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0819456482242 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282860849955 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239310567295 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0557153309237 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019583550138 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.