TPO 15 integrated essay
The article declares that cane toad multiplied rapidly, and their population affects the native animals, to destroy them several methods are used and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that the cane toad is not easy to read off and refutes each of the author's reasons.
To begin with, the reading states that a national fence should build to prevent the spread of cane tode. On the other hand, the speaker contradicts this point by stating that this method is not so effective. He explains that they put their eggs near the river so water can carry these eggs to the other side of Australia. In this case, the fence doesn't control the tod population.
Moreover, passage claims that volunteers could help to capture and destroyed them as they are easy to capture by hand. Nonetheless, the lecturer says that volunteers are not trained, so it is hard for them to differentiate between cane toads and native frogs because they look the same. And they might kill native frogs.
Furthermore, the reading contends that the virus could control the cane toad populations. The professor cast doubt on this theory. He explains that virus could harm to America also because reptile and amphibian species are transported there for research. If those are infected by the virus than they might destroy the can toad population in America and the ecosystem of America.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-28 | emzifer | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | wengwanyu | 80 | view |
| 2021-01-13 | Alaa1980 | 80 | view |
| 2020-09-07 | Morteza1990 | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-23 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e of Australia. In this case, the fence doesnt control the tod population. Moreov...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01287553648 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44601307796 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55364806867 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1600220069 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8461538462 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366479123859 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121376913728 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764157443851 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214055960899 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629427171846 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.