The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.
"According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
According to a recent report from marketing team that past year fewer people attended super screen produced movie but there are no evidence that what happens in past year or some controversy going about the super screen movie production.country going in some tough time in economy or in past year so many movies got released so more competition going on.
Marketing department said that less people attend the movie but did not give the report about the how many people attends compare to past year report.what if country going in some tough time or in recession time so people avoid other expanses.people do not want to spend their money and want to save their money to go through the tough time.
people who attends the movie gave the good review about the movies means the movie is good for the certain type of people so other avoid the movie.In given memo there no specification about movie genre so what if that movie is horror movie but not all people like horror movie so they did not watch the movie and what if past year so many better movies released so all people divided among all movies.
there is another reason why less people watch the movie because there is some controversy going about super screen production that they are not giving salary or super screen production manager caught in some scandal so people protest against them and stop other people to watch movies.
<a>candle</a>
The report is not proper to identify the reason why less people attend the movie past year and has something to do with public's lack of awareness to the movie produced by the super screen Production.there are lots of hidden hurdles not given in the report that become the reason for the people to not watch the movie from super screen.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-18 | YO | 37 | view |
2020-01-03 | Daffodilia | 59 | view |
2019-12-27 | kook | 40 | view |
2019-12-11 | sefeliz | 55 | view |
2019-12-07 | farhadmoqimi | 58 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 37
- "A nation should adopt same curriculum before entering student to college" 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- A tv station's business manager proposes to increase time of local news and weather news in late night news for some reasons. 33
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 15
No. of Words: 308 350
No. of Characters: 1420 1500
No. of Different Words: 124 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.189 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.61 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.329 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 86 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 25 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 51.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 23.185 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.55 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.22 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... Marketing department said that less people attend the movie but did not giv...
^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...movie but did not give the report about the how many people attends compare to past yea...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...y to go through the tough time. people who attends the movie gave the good rev...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...type of people so other avoid the movie.In given memo there no specification about...
^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...eople divided among all movies. there is another reason why less people watch...
^^^^^
Line 19, column 29, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...es. there is another reason why less people watch the movie because there is...
^^^^
Line 25, column 53, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...s not proper to identify the reason why less people attend the movie past year and h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 12.9520958084 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 28.8173652695 38% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 2260.96107784 65% => OK
No of words: 305.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80655737705 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37294161781 2.78398813304 85% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 204.123752495 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.409836065574 0.468620217663 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 705.55239521 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 19.7664670659 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 61.0 22.8473053892 267% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.1321962722 57.8364921388 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 293.2 119.503703932 245% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 61.0 23.324526521 262% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.70786347227 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392725672117 0.218282227539 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.257330947489 0.0743258471296 346% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104991764963 0.0701772020484 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258296651039 0.128457276422 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106051309111 0.0628817314937 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.7 14.3799401198 220% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 18.02 48.3550499002 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.9 12.197005988 212% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.51 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 98.500998004 38% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 12.3882235529 226% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 26.4 11.1389221557 237% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 26.0 11.9071856287 218% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.