Some people claim that the government should provide free health care. Others think that the government will not provide the most innovative methods of treatment and it's better to invest those funds in education and culture. What is your opinion
Fewer mortals concerned that higher authorities should give free of cost health care. However, opponents assert that the most innovative measures of treatment will not be provided by the government and therefore, that money must be invested in education and culture. In my opinion, education and culture are the best option of invest money but, health care is also as important as these fields.
To begin with those who advocate with the first notion believe that give free health care is a moral duty of the government. In other words, since numerous of people in the society cannot afford their and their families treatment because of poverty. As a result, their little illness may lead to a serious disease such as cancer which can difficult to cure. For these reasons it is essential for a government to give free health care facilities. For example, In India people are provided with a card scheme by prime minister where masses can get treatment up to fifty thousand rupees in a year, in any hospital in India. In addition, there will not danger of spreading diseases as every person can be cured.
On the contrary, the latter view suggest that higher authorities may not provide innovative techniques of cure since there are many big hospitals and clinics which possess with expensive equipments of treatment. That is why, they argue that these funds should be utilized in education and culture. For example, number of smart and talented folks are being uneducated because they could not afford the expense of their studies. For this reason, they insist money should be invest on education where everyone can get the studies equally. Apart from this, culture is also main concern. Money spend on heritages and traditions will help the new generation to learn about the history of the country as well as they will bond with their culture.
In conclusion, it is clear from the above discussion, that investing money on the culture and education have great significance. However, in my opinion, it is also responsibility of the government to provide people with health care facilities therefore poor and needy can take advantages from this facility
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-20 | Sandhu param | 56 | view |
2019-12-07 | Đa Thiện | 88 | view |
2019-11-22 | SandraWolfie | 56 | view |
2019-10-28 | Shahrear59 | 82 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of fatal accidents by locations in a European country The survey was conducted in 2000 86
- The chart below shows the amount of area used for growing grains between 1990 and 2010 in a state in Canada 79
- Some people say taxes should be spent on health care. Other people say that there are more important priorities for tax payers money. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people claim that the government should provide free health care. Others think that the government will not provide the most innovative methods of treatment and it's better to invest those funds in education and culture. What is your opinion 56
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 473, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'invested'?
Suggestion: invested
...his reason, they insist money should be invest on education where everyone can get the...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 590, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...is, culture is also main concern. Money spend on heritages and traditions will help t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03899721448 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56392121768 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520891364903 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.675380865 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.411764706 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0588235294 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299609942806 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090239564042 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700959848429 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198745417504 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764009397354 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.