Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The government is better to pay the budget for building the new projects rather than old buildings.
The expense of the erecting or repairing building has been allocated a paramount fund of the country to themselves. In this regard, it is a longstanding debate among the authorities whether they should spend this money on renovating and repair of old buildings or dedicating the budget to erect new buildings. However, there are a lot of proponents and opponents for this topic, I firmly believe it is logical that government pay this fund for new project buildings. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will cogently elaborate on my points of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the old buildings are not as safe as they must be. Hence, the vast majority of engineers believe renovating them is a waste of money. As a case in point, two years ago, earthquake proved that many houses that had been repaired collapsed in the earthquake. In fact, it shows they are not as strong as the new buildings that have been built recently. To reject this idea, the new building must destroy instead of the recently repaired building.
Another equally noteworthy reason in corroborating this issue is that most of the old building is placed in the location that now they changed to the highway, street. Owing to the fact, by increasing the population and knowledge of the people the engineers design a proper pattern for the buildings and streets of the city. Therefore, it is axiomatic that some of this building must be destroyed to make the city more appealing. I cite my experience to shed light in this context. Five years ago, we renovated our stores and paid plenty of money for this purpose but the municipal decided to make the street wider. Consequently, not only we had to delete our store but also we remain with myriad loans that we got from the bank.
Finally, it is an indisputable fact that historical places are deserved to repair. Because they show the history of the country and the government can absorb more tourists and help the economy of the country. Without a shadow of a doubt, we achieve more profit than something is paid for them.
In brief, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that by allocating the budget of the country to the new projects like building a new hospital, school, apartments and other things, not only are we sure about the resistant and safety of them but also we help to the development of the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...profit than something is paid for them. In brief, all the aforementioned reasons...
^^^^
Line 9, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...help to the development of the country.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, so, therefore, in brief, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75845410628 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69625813493 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51690821256 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7666785605 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.684210526 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7894736842 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260015381265 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723092766032 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071400604089 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137673911922 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768107078208 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.