Many people are busy with work and do not have enough time to spend with family and friends. Why does this happen? What are the effects of this on family life and society as a whole?
An increasing number of employees nowadays find it hard to juggle work with family and friendship commitment. I believe both company and employees are there to blame for this phenomenon, and a lack of intimacy in family as well as stability of society would be caused accordingly.
The main reason for an unbalanced life would be the heavy workloads that employees are suffering from. It is not uncommon for workers to have hectic schedules as well as strict deadlines, as companies want to make more profits but at the same time cut cost. Another possible factor fueling this phenomenon would be related to the working habits of employees. Some employees are not competent in time management and prioritizing tasks on a daily basis, therefore leading to lower efficiency at work, which could have a negative effect on their work-life balance.
Several consequences could be linked to a busy life. The first and most obvious would be a low- intimacy family life. If people regularly commune with their friends and family, they can share their difficulties in work and life, and receive suggestions from their beloved ones. During this process, workers feel understood and supported. However, such family intimacy and sense of belonging are missed out upon when workers are overwhelmed by their work and find no time to allocate to family members.
A chaotic work-family life can also do a disservice to the stability of the society. This is because when people are inundated with work pressure and find nowhere to alleviate, high chances are that they would go through a series of mental illnesses, leading to a higher suicide rate. In 2019 one of the biggest multinational corporation Google had experienced several continuing cases of workers killing themselves after months of working overtime. Such phenomenon has given rise to drastic discussions and strikings in the workplace, which definitely affects the social cohesion and stability of the country.
To conclude, both companies and employees play a role in busy work life, and negative consequences of lacking intimacy in family life and threatening stability of the society are worth noticing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-04 | MinyiChu | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-03 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | sharanbhullar | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | idid382002 | 84 | view |
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Some people think that teenage years are the happiest times of most people s lives others think that adult life brings more happiness in spite of greater responsibilities Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places. What are the serious problems? What measures can be used to solve these problems? 73
- Some people think that formal education should start for children as early as possible while others think that it should not start until 7 years of age Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- It is becoming increasingly popular for people to travel to tourist destinations during public holidays What problems does this cause What solutions are there to these problems 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun intimacy seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lack of intimacies'.
Suggestion: a lack of intimacies
...there to blame for this phenomenon, and a lack of intimacy in family as well as stability of socie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21489971347 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80691458157 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561604584527 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8346876558 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307559651677 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969216501415 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506396166946 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175506642937 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331563695466 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.