Many people are busy with work and do not have enough time to spend with family and friends. Why does this happen? What are the effects of this on family life and society as a whole?
It seems to be an increasingly widespread concern that overwork is stealing our family time.And I think that the keen competition and modern communication technology are responsible for this.
In the past, it was not uncommon for the husband to be the bread winner, while the wife stayed home to raise children. This is no longer the case. Nowadays, both men and women have to work to cover increasing costs of living. Moreover, due to booming population and globalization, people have to compete not only with more an more domestic university graduates, but also with qualified job applicants from overseas, in order to obtain a decent position in the workplace. So, this intense social rivalry is one of the root causes of people have less family time.
Another important factor contributing to this phenomenon is the advancement in communication technology. For example, mobile phones and the Internet have increased work efficiency on one hand, but on the other hand they have reduced the time people spent with those they care about. In the past, we would visit our parent’s home and stay with them for several hours during a traditional festival. Later, as mobile phones became popular, we might only give them a two-minute call; now we could express our regards by sending a message in just a few short seconds.
Of course, this issue is bringing some negative effects to both family life and society. The husband and wife may be too tired to have quality time together after work; when they come back home too late, they might not be able to talk and play with their sleeping kids. While material wealth is accumulated, the emotional bonds between people get weaker. The problem many families already have is a social concern. Although many counties deem a higher GDP as the indicator of social progress, I personally do not think this figure can fully represent the happiness and well-being of those members of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-04 | MinyiChu | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-03 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | sharanbhullar | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | idid382002 | 84 | view |
- The range of technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor To what extent do you agree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowldege or experience 89
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 56
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makecomparsons where relevant 67
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
...at overwork is stealing our family time.And I think that the keen competition and m...
^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ople have to compete not only with more an more domestic university graduates, but...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, while, for example, i think, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96923076923 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6512759014 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5421405675 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29534619451 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949593877564 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637344732175 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17142525997 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560964518719 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.