In some countries the number of people who visit art galleris is decling
-what are the reason for this?
-how can we solve this problem?
Art galleries is a platform of social network and shows the creativity of individual person. The foot steps to art galleries are decreased. There are significant reasons which influenced directly to art galleries. In this essay, I will explain all the reasons and give relevant solution respectively.
The trend of social media and internet version has totally changed. People are moving to visits anywhere to visit online websites. Nowadays, art galleries are totally decling, the internet market business has provided wide range of marketing strategy to explore the art forms. Artists are plagarizing the different arts from internet and sell at very low rates artist are using digital printing and stitch to Converse board so visitors can not find any unique piece of canvas and this new marketing strategies spreads everywhere so people are not visit any kind of art galleries. However, talking about tourist they are also not finding a such kind of places to visit that is the reason behind clean the declination of art galleries. Tourist can not find realistic place and knowledge for art galleries.
On the other hand. Ther are some potential ways to explore and solutions ways towards art forms. Firstly, school and universities has to complsive visit to set exhibitions and art studios. So from that students inspired from art and take art as hobbies as career. Secondly, the interior of art studios. People are not only visit to see arts but they also find environment of art gallery. For instance, art studios has background instrumental music, silent colour walls with hanged white canvas. So, people can also leave their signature a mark of visit.
Last but not least, artists have uniquality to attract visitors and tourists. They have to explain their arts in own way. Because of this explanation people wants to buy. The main reason behind of this explanation is they can show their hard work towards they spend one two months to make one art.
To conclude, this essay. Developing art galleries to more realistic is the only one thing is hardwork and supporters, which is totally missed nowdays. People have to keen to express their creativity in this art forms After that one person can easily become artist.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-13 | mysterious13 | 69 | view |
- In the past lectures were used as a way of reaching large numbers of students but now with the development of technology for education many people believe there is no justification for attending lectures 73
- In some countries the number of people who visit art galleris is decling what are the reason for this how can we solve this problem 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'rates'' or 'rate's'?
Suggestion: rates'; rate's
...arts from internet and sell at very low rates artist are using digital printing and s...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... have to explain their arts in own way. Because of this explanation people wants to buy...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, kind of, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05962059621 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55976082802 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533875338753 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.4986990839 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.68 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.76 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303621554249 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906461495484 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468583498586 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184014108034 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170892691099 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.