It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and language skill than people who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that some people believe that reading for pleasure can hone both skills of imaginations and language rather than watching TV. I completely agree with this opinion.
Reading for enjoyment can help people develop their imagination and language skills in many ways. Firstly, while watching TV is said to be a kind of passive activity, reading is consider to be an active form of learning. Reading books stimulate people’s brain as they have to use their imagination to visualize characters and plot of stories, which helps them develop their imaginative thinking skills. Secondly, if people read books regularly, especially foreign languge books, they would meet a whole host of not only new structures but also new vocabularies, which help them speak and write better.
However, watching TV does a little of improving skills in both imagination and language for some reasons. First, since programs on TV, such as movies, are always broadcasted and spoke on a fast pace, hence viewer will have a little amount of time to catch up and comprehend its contents, which limits their abilities to think about anything new. Furthermore, there is too much advertisement on TV these days, which distracts viewers from what they are seeing. This makes it even more difficult for people to absorb information that help them enhance their skill of language.
In conclusion, I completely agree that reading books is a more efficient way to develop imagination and language skills than watching TV, which should be considered as just a source of news.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-21 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-15 | hungnguyen2712 | 61 | view |
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems 67
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and language skill than people who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012 67
- There is no need to complete an education beyond a primary school level Do you agree or not 67
- In countries where there is high unemployment most pupils should be offered only primary education There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
... a kind of passive activity, reading is consider to be an active form of learning. Readi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14173228346 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72005078948 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606299212598 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.721382951 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.727272727 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364149777624 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150924204371 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105335833705 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252417655592 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569345986359 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
... a kind of passive activity, reading is consider to be an active form of learning. Readi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14173228346 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72005078948 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606299212598 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.721382951 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.727272727 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364149777624 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150924204371 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105335833705 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252417655592 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569345986359 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.