The best way to solve world's environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.
Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion?
It is argued that the most effective solution to environmental pollution around the world is to lift the price of fuel. I can only partly agree with this view.
On the one hand, raising the cost of fuel can have a direct impact on the demand for fuel. From a consumer’s perspective, when fuel was less affordable, the motive to drive and use fuel-powered engines in households would be weakened, leaving less carbon dioxide emissions released into the atmosphere. At the same time, people would search for other types of energy, most of which available are less detrimental to the environment compared to fossil fuel. The same pattern of behavior could be seen in industries where companies race to reduce the consumption of fuel to bring the cost of production down. All these changes in fuel consumption would spark competition among energy production companies in bringing new, cleaner and cheaper alternatives to fuel to life.
On the other hand, more actions need to be taken to deal with such a global issue as environmental contamination. Firstly, tougher policies related to the environment should be put in place to limit the amount of carbon dioxide released into the air. To do this, CO2 quotas should be imposed on industries, and those being found exceeding the limit should be punished with zero tolerance. Besides, environment protection campaigns should be encouraged and given adequate publicity to raise awareness of environmental issues. When people comprehend the seriousness of the current situation, they will be more likely to engage in preservation efforts.
In conclusion, adjustments to fuel prices alone are insufficient to protect the environment. The government should enact stringent policies and support environmental campaigns.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-17 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-21 | Inpu Nguyen | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-20 | moonlucas | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-10 | NigarM | 64 | view |
| 2020-02-16 | hoakim | 89 | view |
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world what are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 82
- Oil use of major consumers 67
- Society is based on rules and laws If individuals were free to do whatever they want to do it could not function To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 73
- Nowadays in many countries more and more people are spending their time away from their families Why is this What are the effects on themselves and on their families 80
- Oil consumption by major consumers 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.325 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01467287629 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0813585863 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133003465787 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510731999962 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362281702899 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911724824993 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362444425449 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.