TPO26- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents' jobs.
In today's progressive world, no one can turn a blind eye to the significant effects of the job in our life. Some people argue that is good for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs. On the other extreme of the rope, others hold the opposite opinion. Although both sides take their own positions, personally speaking, I firmly believe that the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraph, I will explain my reasons to justify my points of view.
As the first and paramount reason, choosing a job that is like children parent's work, children will be able to develop functional and helpful skill for their future objetives since when they were young. In other words, it is a good form to incorporate ideas and concepts that will be very useful in their career. Moreover, their parents can provide for them an important support for their job. As a result, they will have people to trust and help them.
The second reason that coming to my mind to substantiate my viewpoint is that, jobs that are similar to children parent's jobs sometimes can provide for young people a good career in their work. To be more specific, it can provide for them less stress and worries in their jobs. For instance, an experimental research conducted by some master professors shows that people who have few worries and stress in their life have less mental disease, such as depression. Hence, in my view, having a job that is analogue of your parent's job can generate a great lifestyle.
In conclusion, take the above reasons into account, I strongly believe that children who choose jobs that are like to their parents not only open up a whole gamut of good opportunities to develop knowledge, but it also provide for the a life with less stress and worries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-19 | Umme Abiha | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | Umme Abiha | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | nida fatima | 71 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at a young age 76
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage As early as the twelfth century A D the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for 66
- Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature novels plays and poems th 3
- Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...ities to develop knowledge, but it also provide for the a life with less stress and wor...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...elop knowledge, but it also provide for the a life with less stress and worries.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74276527331 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46309386781 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524115755627 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1681317778 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.357142857 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390400061538 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148544055775 0.076458572812 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131588469786 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261943292462 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261243807117 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.