It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
If behaviors related to adhering to their belief infringe on human rights, sticking to one’s purpose is detrimental to society. To elaborate, IS members are jihadists, who adhere to an extreme interpretation of Sunni Islam and consider themselves the only true believer. They hold that the rest of the world is made up of unbelievers, who seek to destroy Islam, Justifying attacks against other Muslims and non-Muslims alike. They mercilessly have murdered people who are against their belief or sometimes they just killed innocent people without manifest reasons. This brutal activity is caused by adhering to the thought that their belief is only the truth. If they could respect other believers, they would not suppress other believers brutally. When his belief is harmful to human rights, it would be beneficial to give up one’s post on other people.
When his or her belief supports and protects human rights, people should not compromise their beliefs. For example, Gandhi was a leader of the Indian independence movement against British rule. Employing nonviolent civil disobedience, Gandhi led India to independence and inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world. If he gave up and compromised with the British government and enjoyed his convenient life, he could not lead the independence of India and influence the world. As this example shows, to advocate human rights, a person should hold on his or her belief.
Moreover, even though it sticks to own creed mars human rights to some degree, if it benefits whole society, a person should hold to his or her opinion. For example, Margaret Thatcher, who was the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom in 20th, emphasized deregulation, flexible labor markets, the privatization of state-owned companies, and reduction of the welfare. Many people resisted her policy to cut the welfare, she persisted on her philosophy. As a result of her policy, United Kingdom could escape from long and deep economic depression. Although her policy had harmed people in part because many people had suffered from reduced welfare and easy dismissal due to the flexible labor markets, it salvaged whole society from disastrous hire. Considering benefits to whole society by sacrificing some people, a leader should insist his or her belief if the leader can judge the current situation well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-04-09 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 50 | view |
- “Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.” Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, b 66
- Alcohol related deaths 2005 and average beer consumption Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown in the diagram Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 58
- Some people become famous when they are at a young age Do you think this is positive or negative 61
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24338624339 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72627487168 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544973544974 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8107699074 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.111111111 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.079700727887 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028165943322 0.0831039109588 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241799240376 0.0758088955206 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0542499124333 0.150359130593 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016603062756 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.