The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The table chart illustrates transformation of changes in miles travelled by single person through eight modes such as car, local bus, walking, long distance bus, train, taxi, and others. This data of comparison made in England between year of 1985 and 2000.
A glimpse over the diagram portray some intriguing patterns. Overall, it is clearly seen that the median distance in miles commuted per person was increased sequentially from 1985 to 2000. In addition, albeit there were significant changes were noticed in distance traveled through every mode, people in England preferred commuting through car enormously than that of other modes, in both given period.
In terms of car where the most eye-catching numbers were noticed. In 1985, people travelled 3,099 miles of distance which had increased dramatically to 4,806 miles in 2000. Similarly, at the same period of time, the utilization of long distance bus, train, taxi and other transportation techniques were also showed substantial increase in number of miles travelled by Britains.
On the other hand, unlikely, the scenario changed completely the opposite in modes like Bicycle, walking, and Local bus. As per the provided data, all three ways of travelled distance were decreased from 1985 to 2000. However, the local bus usage showed a considerable decline that is 429 and 274 miles per person in 1985 and 2000, respectively, when compared with other two mode's travel distance.
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car 73
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth 56
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 87
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... person through eight modes such as car, local bus, walking, long distance bus,...
^^
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ugh eight modes such as car, local bus, walking, long distance bus, train, taxi...
^^
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...modes such as car, local bus, walking, long distance bus, train, taxi, and othe...
^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...car enormously than that of other modes, in both given period. In terms of car w...
^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...most eye-catching numbers were noticed. In 1985, people travelled 3,099 miles of d...
^^
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...6 miles in 2000. Similarly, at the same period of time, the utilization of long distance bus, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, the utilization of long distance bus, train, taxi and other transportation te...
^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tilization of long distance bus, train, taxi and other transportation techniques...
^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and Local bus. As per the provided data, all three ways of travelled distance wer...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31004366812 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71150558596 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598253275109 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9480596218 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.545454545 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248701209158 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100310604736 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677795948764 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169642369666 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066148232438 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.