Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease ? prons/ cons.
The importance of video communication between doctors and patients was always debatable topic has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while of other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition has to be rational. This essay will further elaborate of this argument and thus will lead to be logical conclusion of this trend.
The myriad reason of the argument will further elaborate, but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that the video calling between doctor and patients are beneficial its save time with the help of this. We haven’t travel for meet the doctor. Furthermore, in case of emergency it helps a lot. Another pivotal aspect of this trend that the, whenever masses are go out of station, they can get treatment instantly. Needless to say, there are merits of stead in good stand.
However there are some pitfalls that negate this argument and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one the most alarming one is that the video calling is replaces hospitals, which cause unemployment of workers. Besides, people are not well educated. Therefore they cannot get proper use of video calling.
According to my view point aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the everybody has own views which is based on this knowledge and experience as well. In my opinion video communication has more merits that demerits.
- Should developing countries concentrate on improving industrial skills or should they promote education first 92
- small shops 72
- cars and airplane 87
- experiment learning is better than formal learning 77
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e time with the help of this. We haven’t travel for meet the doctor. Furthermore,...
^^
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...other pivotal aspect of this trend that the, whenever masses are go out of station, ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 368, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...his trend that the, whenever masses are go out of station, they can get treatment ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ere are merits of stead in good stand. However there are some pitfalls that negate thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... Besides, people are not well educated. Therefore they cannot get proper use of video cal...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'everybody'?
Suggestion: the; everybody
...ove, one can reach to a conclusion that the everybody has own views which is based on this kn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1185770751 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7332580253 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588932806324 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7702845771 50.4703680194 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140776728838 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494845629299 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634169381064 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859286149461 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413184975183 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.