Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Relationships have a great impact on our lives. It affects our overall well-being as it influences our lives directly. Therefore, I strongly agree with the statement that the ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for our happiness. This is due to the fact that maintaining old friendships not only can it build trust bonds, but it can also, increase our self-satisfaction.
To begin with, having relationships with few people for a long period of time is more beneficial for our happiness because we can trust them more. In fact, people tend to be happier when they have few friends that they consider as family members, and this can not happen without long time friendships. For instance, people can say that a person is trustworthy only when they see this person's reaction in different situations, like stress, sad and angry situations, which can reveal the person's real personalities. Moreover, people feel happy with they feel that they are secured. Having a friend for a long time can provide this feeling of security because they have seen over this long period of time that their friends always have been there for them.
Another reason why I think this is the ultimate choice is self-satisfaction. Indeed, people feel good about themselves when they maintain relationships for a long period of time because it can prove to them that they are good people. For example, when my brother was a teenager, he had only two closed friends. He used to tell me that people did not like him because he is so quiet and introvert person; however, his friends always were there to assure him that the other people lost a chance to meet someone with kind and nice like him. Now, even though they live in different countries, they promised each other that they meet at least once a year to keep in touch. Actually, they have made a huge impact on my brother's personality, he becomes happier as time passed by their relationship. thus, I believe that maintaining a friendship with a small group of friends is more important for a person's happiness.
For the aforementioned reasons, I genuinely agree that keeping friendships with few people for a long time is more crucial for our psychological states. Hopefully, more people try to straighten their bond with their inner circle in order to have happier people in the community, who can contribute to having a better, and safer environment in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- TPO 27 integrated essay 81
- TPO 40 integrated writing 80
- TPO 41 80
- TPO21 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 65
- too 35 integrated essay 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...he ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...th a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for our happiness. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...elationships with few people for a long period of time is more beneficial for our happiness be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... is trustworthy only when they see this persons reaction in different situations, like ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...y because they have seen over this long period of time that their friends always have been the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... they maintain relationships for a long period of time because it can prove to them that they ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 793, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...r as time passed by their relationship. thus, I believe that maintaining a friendshi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 893, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...roup of friends is more important for a persons happiness. For the aforementioned re...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, at least, for example, for instance, i think, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86255924171 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79742121667 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481042654028 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3696360331 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302053762347 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11424324471 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133785348947 0.0737576698707 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208441067767 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035288437956 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.