People think that governments should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinions.
While it is believed that higher cost for fuel may improve matters, I would argue that this is not an optimal solution, and there are other ways to mitigate the impacts on the environment.
A rise in the price of petrol would disadvantage individuals and the society as a whole. If gas prices surged, there would likely be significant increases in the costs of other household appliances and products. However, these people rely heavily on menial jobs and agriculture to make ends meet. Therefore, they would have to make cutbacks in household budgets to make the most of their incomes. From the perspective of society, as fuel costs soar, consumer sentiment plummets. Consequently, people would put off discretionary purchases, namely recreational activities and accessories, as they only have a limited ability to change how much gasoline they consume. This can have detrimental impacts on business and weaken the economy.
Alternatively, there are better solutions to environmental problems. Firstly, governments should impose restraint policies on cars and other motorized vehicles during peak periods. This is known as road space rationing which has successfully reduced traffic congestions and carbon emissions in cities, namely Beijing and Sao Paulo. Secondly, governments should also improve and expand the public transport system. The problems with public transport at the moment are that they are inconvenient and people have limited access to them in some regions. Therefore, solving these problems can minimize the use of private vehicles, which can be done by offering membership cards and vouchers, cleaning the vehicles frequently, etc.
In conclusion, while increasing the price of fuel has serious consequences, there are more efficient measures to tackle environmental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-06 | Huong Giang 73 | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-20 | imbobbb | 84 | view |
- some people tink that news has no connection with people s lives so it is a waste of time to read newspaper and watch television news programmes Do you disagree or agree 56
- some people arrgue that the best way to reduce crime is to longer prison sentences Others think there are better alternatives 61
- some people arrgue that the best way to reduce crime is to longer prison sentences Others think there are better alternatives 67
- most large companies nowadays operate multi nationally To what extend do multi national companies have responsibility towards local communities in which they operate 89
- People think that governments should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinions 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14790996785 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89630838627 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604501607717 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2835382203 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.733333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242020985601 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717975436972 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701214118611 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119187617967 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691340728447 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.