The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five proportions of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The bar chart illustrates, the ratio of men, women and children who consumed five proportions of fruits and vegetables every day in these 8 years between 2001 and 2008 in the United Kingdom.
Overall, it can be see that the highest percentage of all the people was women. While, the adolescents constantly remained the lowest proportion of eating healthy fruits and vegetables.
In 2001, ladies have eaten 22% of the vegetables and fruits. After next five years (2006) the figure of the females have increased and reached to peak level which was round about 35 percent.
Males and teenagers, the percentage remained stable in 2001, 2002 and 2003. For the first three years the adult’s ratio was approximately 13% while the young age people were about 18%. Male consumption raised in 2006 to 28% and it also remained stable in 2007 but in 2008 it showed a minor decrease which was almost 27%. Meanwhile, the growth of figure in children also inclined and reached to 25% in 2007 but after following year it dropped to 25%.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 78
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to Increase the price of fuel 56
- Some people think that happiness relies on the individuals Others argue that it is affected by other factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that paying tax is their only duty while others believe that we have more responsibilities towards our society Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that online reading material should be only used for child to learn to read whereas believe that only printed materials should be used Discuss both views and give your opinion 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82954545455 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50884283194 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9818106775 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4444444444 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2356611224 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887589964566 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083757838673 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146612353569 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943253955423 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.