the graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world
The provided line graph illustrates the number of overseas tourist destinations in various places in the world in the 1990-2005 period.
From first glance, there were significant rises in all figures for people who arrived abroad during the 15-year.
It is noticeable that the majority of international travelers belonged to North America, at approximately 70 million in 1990. This figure was nearly 7-fold as high as people who moved to Sub-Saharan Africa during this year. Central and Eastern Europe and South-East Asia contributed the second (roughly 30 million) and the third (nearly 20 million) respectively in the first year.
Regarding the data, we can recognize that there was the largest change by over 60 million in the number of overseas visitors landing in Central and Eastern Europe throughout 15 years. As a result, North America shared equal figures for international travelers in comparison with central and Eastern Europe, which formed just under 90 million, after considerable upward trends. While having the same data at about 10 million in 1990, the figure for visitors from abroad who went to Sub-Saharan Africa was about 5 million higher than in South America in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 | hien3112 | 75 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-05 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | hunghoang | 84 | view |
- In many parts of the world there is continuous coverage of sport on television Some people believe this discourages the young from taking part in any sport themselves 95
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, so, third, while, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24083769634 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69810850031 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61780104712 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1436268384 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.125 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0840204729801 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039378450227 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433641860411 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619191104821 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456611506184 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.