Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life.
Recently, the principle of selecting any jobs has become an ongoing topic of debate in many parts of the world. It is a common belief that pursuing an ideal career path plays an indispensable role in working life. Nevertheless, there is a more persuasive argument that adults should give more stress on choosing a job, which can meet one’s earning requirement on a daily basis.
On the one hand, doing the position of a dream job can present a huge influence on satisfied later working life. Specifically, employees will never be fed up with any challenging tasks at hand and always strive further when working in an enjoyable environment because they express a desire to achieve the award-winning during working time. This can lead to the promotion of working as well as promotion prospects. For example, coveted jobs can contribute a decline to being under pressure from deadlines or assignments. It is due to the fact that workers always have great effort, determination and ambition to outperform in comparison with their colleagues in the competitive atmosphere with more passion.
Conversely, mature people should give more value in a working life without much concern about earning the living. It fosters a career with high income by making adults live in good financial health from an economic perspective. For example, workers can complete their tasks on time and effectively when they do not have to withstand negative emotions about financial burdens. According to the Oxford survey, approximately 92% of employees choosing high-income jobs instead of one they always dream in the past, and 70% of them could be well-performed and have well-being lives.
To sum up, while keeping to their desirable jobs is one way by which people can avoid giving up ones’ works, determining career paths with great wages can assume even greater significance in the advantageous financial backgrounds in later life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | TLan168 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | andreahoangbp | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | andreahoangbp | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | TLan168 | 60 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Vuthungan | 84 | view |
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the use of others is rapidly declining Is it a positive or negative development 73
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
- The line graph compares the percentage of people in three countries who used the Internet between 1999 and 2009 60
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the use of others is rapidly declining Is it a positive or negative development 78
- In many parts of the world there is continuous coverage of sport on television Some people believe this discourages the young from taking part in any sport themselves 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 211, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to further'
Suggestion: to further
...lenging tasks at hand and always strive further when working in an enjoyable environmen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17363344051 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89094169143 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601286173633 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8733094827 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.769230769 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165787102621 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618124084467 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299267975776 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105661260964 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369928218383 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.