In some countries, criminal trials are shown on television for the public. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In contemporary era everything is attached with electronic media so as the courts. In different countries the courts are linked with the television so, the judgment of different cases are displayed on the television. From my point of view, advantages have outweigh the disadvantages.
Firstly, in this contemporary era most of the education is learned from electronic media where the student of law at their initial stages of learning can learn about the communication skills and manner of court as well as how to tackle harsh situation from the professional lawyers. Furthermore, a lay man can also learn those skills of layers up to some extent from these types of programs due to which he can defend himself. Secondly, society can be aware by broadcasting live criminal trials which are shown to the public, they will know the consequences of the mistake which they try to do in future. Thirdly, the trial will be fair because expert lawyers around the globe will be watching it.
One the other hand, it may have some drawbacks, the family of the culprit will face a lot of problems. They will not be respected by the members of the society, they will not be allowed to take part in any traditional functions or marriages. Additionally, it may have negative impacts on their brain. They might become psycho. Another disadvantage is, culprit can learn weak points and erase all the proofs due to which the proof cannot be proved or it may be erased which might give tough time to investigators to find such evidence against the culprit.
Overall, showing trails of criminals may have both pros and cons but advantages have outweigh te disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-10 | Luisjackiet | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-02 | Anastasia Chinemerem Izundu | 11 | view |
| 2020-08-02 | Anastasia Chinemerem Izundu | 51 | view |
| 2020-07-22 | dantesw | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-22 | dantesw | 56 | view |
- The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 different kinds of meat in a European country from 1979 to 2004 73
- The charts below shows the spending of school in UK from 1981 to 2001 73
- Some people agree with spending lots of money on a large wedding while others think it is a waste of money What is your opinion 67
- The graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown 70
- The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1988 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
... From my point of view, advantages have outweigh the disadvantages. Firstly, in this c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 595, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ces of the mistake which they try to do in future. Thirdly, the trial will be fair becaus...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
... both pros and cons but advantages have outweigh te disadvantages.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91785714286 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79640576528 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9013381015 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.923076923 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151327057799 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479855155832 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545721476142 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904850695994 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368338349718 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.