Nowadays, more and more jobs and tasks which involve hard physical work are done by machines. Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects?
In recent decades, a growing number of physically-demanding jobs and tasks are done by machinery instead of by hands. I maintain that the positive impacts of this tendency outweigh the negative impacts.
First of all, although it may sound scary, technology, machinery and artificial intelligence do bring earth-shaking changes to the entire human race, especially in the workplace. In terms of hands-on, repetitive jobs, if human labour is largely replaced by high-tech products such as robots, the most evident hazard could be that a sea of people would face unemployment. Particularly, people with occupations like drivers and waiters are on top of the list of losing their jobs. Compared to the relatively cheaper human labour, the utilization of machinery may be much costlier. From the above, it can be inferred that there would be a dramatic economic downturn due to large-scale unemployment and the huge expenditure on the expensive mechanical equipment.
On the contrary, not only could machines free human beings from trivial, laborious, and time-consuming chores, but also could they stimulate people's imagination, creativity and emotional intelligence, making the world a more humane place to live in. When people are liberated from intensive stiff, repetitive and even soulless manual tasks, their lives would become easier and they would be entitled to more time and freedom to do what they genuinely long for from the inside. Specifically, people would be given chance to develop their potentials in subjects like art, humanities, design, and so on, or, for instance, work as a psychologist who utilizes emotional skills and humanity to cure people, which robotics cannot comprehend and substitute for. As a result, there would be a deeper sense of happiness, enjoyment and satisfaction amongst the whole human species. In other words, liberation from boring physical work by machinery would bring about delight and betterment for the whole society.
In conclusion, I concur that the pros of the trend mentioned above surpass its cons, because of the freedom and enjoyment it would bring to humans.
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and gi 89
- Nowadays more and more jobs and tasks which involve hard physical work are done by machines Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 89
- Some people think that the only way to judge someone s success in business is by the amount of money they make Is money a true indicator of the success of a business In what other ways could success in a business be measured 56
- Some people think that success in life comes from hard work and determination while others think that there are more important factors such as money and appearance Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists To what extent do you agree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...endency outweigh the negative impacts. First of all, although it may sound scar...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on the expensive mechanical equipment. On the contrary, not only could machines...
^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'machine'
Suggestion: machine
...nt. On the contrary, not only could machines free human beings from trivial, laborio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and betterment for the whole society. In conclusion, I concur that the pros of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, even so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38138138138 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00982108886 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624624624625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5564007689 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.846153846 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113471763937 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435115706396 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531549649918 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085263386242 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084935896083 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.