The pie charts below shows the average household expenditure in a country in 1950 and 2010.
The two pie charts give the information about, a nation expenses of a regular household over the 60 decades from 1950 to 2010. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, it can be seen from both the charts that the most popular were housing and food on which the individuals have spent their money over the period given whereas health was the least. Transportation and other showed an increase in the percentage of expenditure. Education have experienced a downward trend in the number.
According to the graph, housing was on the top of the people attraction on which the people have spent their savings with the percentage of 72.1 in 1950, but in 2010 it has experienced a huge fall which was 22%. The second popular in 1950 was food with 11.2% and this increased almost a triple (11.2%) in 2010 in contrast to 1950. The percentage of education was 6.6% and then slightly decreased to 6.3% in 2010.
Health care, transportation and other was lower than approximately 5% in the beginning but it showed a rise till the end of period given which was 4.5%, 19.2% and 14.0% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-21 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | Mostakima Tawrin | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | quytnee | 84 | view |
- Some people think that paying tax is their only duty while others believe that we have more responsibilities towards our society Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- The diagram below shows how sand dune are formed 52
- Many students take part time jobs while studying in university Is this good idea or bad idea 73
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 73
- The table below shows the in which sector of the economy different age groups were employed 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, then, whereas, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7619047619 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71595089036 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550264550265 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2329571259 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175303464881 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070566398907 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731045350823 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109059332157 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749190461949 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.