The table below shows causes of injuries in Australia for teenagers and the general population.
The data gives information about the number of injuries for teenagers and people of all ages in Australia, depending on different types of causes.
Overall, it can be seen clearly that complications of medical care represented for the main reason among the general population, whereas teenagers were more likely to be hospitalised by transport accidents than people of all ages. Moreover, in contrast to the highest record number in total population’s injuries, females between 13 and 19 saw the lowest number in injuries.
The most common reason for injuries was total transport accidents with 779 cases of boy, 323 of girls, 557 of total teenagers, and 305 of the general population per 100000 cases respectively. Additionally, pedestrian, which was accidents related to vehicles like transport accidents, was the least common reason when its injury rate figured for nearly 50 cases per 100000 cases for all age and sex groups.
On the other hand, the other causes such as: falls or complications of medical care were more popular in adults than teenagers with the number of complications being the highest of hospitalisation for people of all ages among all the causes listed in the table, standing at 1431 cases per 100000 cases. Furthermore, assault and accidental poisioning were two factors, which were similar to pedestrians and exposure of heat, accounting for low number only under 200 cases per 100000 cases.
- Students should pay the full cost of their own university studies rather than have free higher education provided by the state 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Students should pay the full cost of their own university studies rather than have free higher education provided by the state 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectoures in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, as to, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23144104803 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87449042778 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558951965066 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2840908829 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.142857143 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7142857143 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5714285714 5.23603664747 278% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2008087664 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981929636742 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512368737442 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130450294391 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376430546193 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.