The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.
The table illustrates data on the proportion of schoolboys in two groups age participating in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.
Overall, the percent of boys aged between 6 and 11 years old playing all items of sports was higher than the older boys in school, with the notable exception of swimming, which was the same.
87 percent of the boys years old from 6 to 11 were playing football, with the highest in all options for item sports, this figure for boys aged 12 to 16 years old about 78 percent. In addition, the schoolboys chose cricket in the second-ranking in list items sports, with different groups between 6 and 11 years old and boys between 6 and 11 years olds to have got 45 percent and 35 percent respectively. There was similar in a basic tendency with basketball and rugby for both groupage. This figure lower than compared with the proportion in football and cricket.
By contrast, both groups between 6 and 11 years old and groups between 6 and 11 years olds were the same in going swimming, with 19 percent. This figure was lowest in all subject sport in school.
- The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010 67
- Some people think that the government should offer financial support and care to old people while others think that people should save money for their future life. Discuss both these views and give your own opinions. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 11
- Some people think that genetically modified ( GM) crops are positive development. Others, however argue that they are potentially dangerous. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57142857143 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56826822314 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469387755102 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6612742532 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220291314319 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121705893424 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152971972416 0.0843802449381 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210115220348 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172791315229 0.0819641961636 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.