The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
In a time of peace government has always been trying to support citizens to make their life as versatile, careless and secure as possible. An opinion exists that state capital investments into entertainment sphere is unreasonable and ought to be assigned on community sector. Though cultural objects and event funding is significant, assignments to utility maintenance is a way more fundamental in current phase.
Firstly, cultural establishments like cinemas and sport stadiums enable population to enhance their education level, spirituality and help to relax after hectic business day. Individuals who prefer recreation hobby and activities usually tend to have much broader world view and intellectual level. Those adults are erudite, can develop and maintain conversation of any topic, moreover these skills boost career path. For example, researches in Montreal University identified that majority of United States presidents and CEOs in Fortune-500 companies all invest in self-development. Thus, craft skills could be beneficial for individual growth and professional promotion which is one of the leading requirement in the Maslov hierarchy of needs.
Secondly, the prosperity of civil sector is the foundation for nations’ population safety and confidence in future. Impossible to imagine civilized country without strong police system, technological medical institutions and punctual fire departments. Moreover, folks who elect president of the nation pay attention to promises and commitments first and foremost aroused on the subject of social field. For instance, Donald Trump won the latest elections in the United States in 2016 most likely because of his pledges to financially support public services. Hence, stable and strong evolution of economy could be based only on sustainable and successful development of civil branch.
Taking into account all mentioned above, I’m convinced that even though music, art and theater could be beneficial for community, the timely monetary injections to civil service is more significant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-16 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2024-04-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | ZAINBM | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Kaur_Aman | 67 | view |
- It is much more convenient to watch a movie on television or computer than buy a ticket and go to the cinema In the nearest future the popularity of cinemas will drastically decline To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The government should ban smoking in all public places even though this would restrict some other people s freedoms Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer 63
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred 78
- In some parts of the world it is becoming popular to research the history of one’s own family. Why might people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- Ecotourism is now defined as responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment What are the advantages of ecotourism How can we make ecotourism more popular 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vidual growth and professional promotion which is one of the leading requirement ...
^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...tions’ population safety and confidence in future. Impossible to imagine civilized countr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80794701987 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03985052227 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.708609271523 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0346898997 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.285714286 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0747766479852 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0209599678753 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235372297531 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0463846174333 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269700099713 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.