Many people believe that the lecture halls have been replaced by online learning.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What many individuals reckon is that the place of teaching periods is not necessary, since online studying is contributed. I, however, completely disagree with a given statement. Reasons for my altercation, be it the risk of communication traits or eye griefs are discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
To embark with, due to the replacement of lecture halls, there may be a problem of interaction skills transpired. What is it meant to be discerned? At online classes both the students and teachers interact face to face with each other, which probably they are capable of getting potential to speaking. That confidence will aid them to become the best motivation of their life. In contrast, studying online with the worst video calling system is not an alternative for academics and their coaches because at online platform only able to communicate with their voice, not face. For example, the zoom is the app which is useful when it comes to operating online class. Nevertheless, face to face interaction does not permit to be taught in an ideal way.
Similarly to previous drawback, studying online in front of technical devices is invites variety of eye griefs. As ultraviolet rays are harmful for eyes, students have to sit there for a long period at mobile screen, and that types to screens exclude ultraviolet rays. For instance, a denizen who has reeled from insomnia, he cannot able to utilise mobile phone, and in case to student, this surly matters. Eventually, it would be essential to attend lectures with not any threat of getting infected with diseases.
In conclusion, there are multitude of issues are generated, if offline learning is prohibited. The reason including dreadful interaction traits to eye diseases are possible to occur while attending online class.
- The chart shows use of social media by men and women in Austrelia in 2007 and 2014 66
- The chart shows the amount of energy generated from wind in four countries from 1985 to 2000 83
- Some people believe that children's leisure activities must be educational,otherwise they are a complete waste of time.Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience 56
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drink cans 90
- The widespread use of the internet has a bad effect on people development.What are the problems Suggest some solution 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich probably they are capable of getting potential to speaking. That confidence w...
^^
Line 3, column 736, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an ideal way" with adverb for "ideal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nteraction does not permit to be taught in an ideal way. Similarly to previous drawback, stu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...permit to be taught in an ideal way. Similarly to previous drawback, studying online i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nevertheless, similarly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18900343643 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82067582989 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611683848797 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1048270678 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116178609671 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390775548909 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319720431551 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705515034125 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203688498968 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.