Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school.
Do you think this is a good idea?
Psychologists believe that to encourage children; It would be best to give them rewards to do their tasks better and effectively. Although many parents disagree with this motivation, it is evident that this makes the children eager to study. From my perspective, paying money to children when they get a high grade is a perfect solution to motivate them for more try.
To begin with, children prefer to gain something while doing something, whether high or in something else. As a result, to get what they want, such as money, they do their best for that goal. For instance, one of our family members used to give money to her kids to have good grades, so she always tried to get a good mark for that.
Secondly, when they earn money while studying, they learn how to collect money instead of what good things they do to affect their future and career. For example, my brother is a successful businessman, and I remember from childhood, my dad used to pay him money when he has done something right or had good grades.
Finally, in this way, children know how to save money and spend their money because they know how difficult they earned it. Indeed, teaching children from school to know how to earn money and how to manage their money earns. To make this point clear, a kid who got money to regard good grades, he knows the value of money compared to those who get nothing instead of a kind class or right action.
To sum up, always is good to get a reward for something good, so it is a good trick to give student money when they have a good grade. Not only will it help them value money but also keep trying to get better results day by day.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-27 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | zaid | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | reza_fattahi | 90 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | reza_fattahi | 71 | view |
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 68
- tpo48 integrated writing
- tpo36 integrated writing 80
- Tpo10 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4375 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26474231181 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532894736842 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5750433086 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.769230769 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 5.45110844103 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382326088324 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143917482347 0.076458572812 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577523655824 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220467720375 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372110402473 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 86.8835125448 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.