Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at least some of the year, for the ice to cover the sea separating the islands, allowing the deer to travel over it. Unfortunately, according to reports from local hunters, the deer populations are declining. Since these reports coincide with recent global warming trends that have caused the sea ice to melt, we can conclude that the purported decline in deer populations is the result of the deer's being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea.
In the memo given, the author averts about the decline in the arctic deer count might have linkage with the global warming which has substantially made them unable to follow their age-old migration pattern cross the frozen sea. However, while the conclusion drawn by the author might hold water, it rests on several unfolded assumptions that, if not corroborated, dramatically weaken the persuasiveness of the argument. Thus, the following three questions must be addressed.
First of all, have the local hunters been hunting down the arctic deer for their own consumption lately. The people residing on the Arctic Circle hugely depend on hunting the animals. While on this process of surviving in those harsh climatic conditions, there might be a change that hunter beyond the authors reach might have been hunting them down for food and accessories purpose. As we know already that skin of such animals are still widely used for clothing and sheltering in arctic regions. If this condition prevails and proves to be true, then the assertion made by the author is significantly hampered.
Secondly, the arctic deer might be a prey for some undiscovered predatory animals that thrive on them as their primal food. The argument does not mention about the probable predator which might feed on them thus causing a serious decline on their numbers. There are no any instances mentioning about other predatory arctic animals. If such a condition regarding the presence of predatory animals exists, the given assertion by the author is seriously impaired.
Lastly, there might be a case where, the bunch of arctic deer might have migrated towards further north, seeking more cold and harshness. There are cases where animals often migrate from one habitat to the similar one in different bunches. So when the data was taken regarding the count of deer a significant bunch of animals were absent from the sampled area. To support the author’s aversion, a wider sampling area must be chosen where the migrated and non migrated arctic deer can be included for the counting purpose. If the migration of the deer supposed to be true, the author’s claim regarding global warming being the reason for their decline is strongly undermined.
In conclusion, more data and relevance are needed to support the claim of the author. If the above mentioned conditions prevail in the study site then the argument is flawed due to its reliance on several unwarranted assumptions. If these answers could be answered with validity, it will be possible to fully evaluate the credibility of the argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-17 | okazaki11 | 72 | view |
| 2022-06-19 | Soumyadip Kar | 53 | view |
| 2022-05-09 | fredrickomoarukhe37@gmail.com | 54 | view |
| 2021-09-18 | Tej | 60 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | Robur_13 | 55 | view |
- Milk and dairy products are rich in vitamin D and calcium substances essential for building and maintaining bones Many people therefore say that a diet rich in dairy products can help prevent osteoporosis a disease that is linked to both environmental and 59
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- Although innovations such as video computers and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students these technologies all too often distract from real learning 58
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making 83
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 83
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 423 350
No. of Characters: 2114 1500
No. of Different Words: 221 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.535 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.998 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.516 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 156 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 117 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.15 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.872 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.304 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.304 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.098 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ous decline on their numbers. There are no any instances mentioning about other pr...
^^
Line 4, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o the similar one in different bunches. So when the data was taken regarding the count ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ded to support the claim of the author. If the above mentioned conditions prevail ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, while, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 55.5748502994 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 2260.96107784 96% => OK
No of words: 423.0 441.139720559 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12056737589 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6079647077 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 204.123752495 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529550827423 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 705.55239521 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.70958083832 332% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1135073343 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.70786347227 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134813078566 0.218282227539 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452352023078 0.0743258471296 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389203411156 0.0701772020484 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748849277459 0.128457276422 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416505008435 0.0628817314937 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 98.500998004 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.