The diagram below show a town of Felixstone in 1967 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagram below show a town of Felixstone in 1967 and 2001.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The map illustrates the significant differences of Felixstone of the year 1967 and 2001. Overall, Felixstone in 1967, still had farmland and fewer buildings, whereas, all of that being replaced by certain areas in 2001.

In 1967, up in the North, there was a street, called High Street, which will be splitted into 2 directions, West and East, after passed along the shops. However, the shops in the right side of the street, were replaced with apartments, while, the shops in the left side remained the same. Moreover, there was a huge farmland in the North East, but, being removed and turned into a hotel, which also consisted of pools and tennis courts.

Across the farmland, fish market used to operate there, in addition to that, there was also a pier, which connected to marina. Nevertheless, private beach replaced the fish market, while, pier and marina also got cut off and public beach was being built instead. South West from the High Street, it used to have only several trees, dunes, and a hotel. After 34 years, the hotel was being extended and got a new car park. Consequently, the dunes must be reduced to give some space to car park, also for the turbines, which located near the sea.

Votes
Average: 6 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-26 hien3112 78 view
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-10-25 hien3112 67 view
2024-10-21 linhdk35 78 view
Essays by user gisellanathania :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, whereas, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75714285714 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37489228781 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6212321278 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0526782635026 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028272121177 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515010734778 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0583165723845 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725043820256 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.