The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010.
The given maps compare the changes that have taken place in the coastal village of Seaville over a period of 30 years from 1980 to 2010.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the village has undergone numerous renovations resulting in luxurious infrastructure and improved facilities by the end of the period. However, a hotel in the south and a few road connectivities remained unaltered.
According to the given illustration, the Woodland to the north has been switched into a golf course along with few housing units at the roadside. Just across the road, the holiday cottages have been demolished to replace the overall marsh area into permanent residential houses.
In 2010, the central driveway has undergone an extension that leads to a newly built retirement village to the western bank and holiday cottages to the eastern bank of the river. The removal of the tea stall and the sand dunes to the south has resulted in a restaurant and a big hotel. In addition, a boat club has been established on the western bank of the river beside the retirement village.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-17 | Khakimova Kh | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-17 | Khakimova Kh | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-15 | tracy k | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-16 | Qamarbek | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-15 | tracy k | 73 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- In some countries owning a house rather than renting is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative situation 78
- The given figure explains the design of modern landfills for household waste 78
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 78
- The chart shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97297297297 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79327168228 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583783783784 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7999235733 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136095527993 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519380757497 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921217463143 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934320143233 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110806646236 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.