People are using a lot of online language translation apps. Are the advantages more than disadvantages of such services.
Technology has given us many useful resources and one out of which online tool for translating languages these days many of them are using it for better communication with non- native speakers. According to my perspective advantages outweigh the disadvantages, because it is easy to use.
Firstly, the drawback is that data connection to use this system is needed and what if a network is not their then such apps become of no use. In other words, without internet the digital tool is impractical and a person becomes handicapped without guidance. For example, such application is ineffective in a country like Chain and Japan especially dealing into the business it is compulsory to have a human translator for communication. As a result, online tools become a failure in this situation. Moreover, it is not considered professional in the business to use electronic apps for major deals.
On the other hand, such web applications have tremendous usage for tourist. It is profoundly useful and a person can make a conversation with the help of it. Many times tourist faces lots of problem communicating and understanding the cultural aspect of the place but with this, they just need to speak their language and system will translate in a language needed. For instance, earlier people use to hire guides so that they can explore the unknown tertiary, but on average these days, 75% of travellers depend on online translator since it easy to use and expense of a guide has cut-down. Therefore, it has made life easier for a conversation with non- native speaker.
To conclude, such applications play a major role for tourists and even saves the cost of the guide, with the help, is they can explore by themselves. Since the usage is essential and drawback can be covered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-13 | Anupama Barooah | 79 | view |
| 2020-06-01 | wjl881219 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | enassar | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | Gurpreet1993 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | Sakthisv | 30 | view |
- In recent years many small local shops have closed because consumers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping Is this a positive or a negative development 67
- People visiting other countries should adapt to the customs and behaviours expected there They should not expect the host country to welcome different customs and behaviours To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that cooking food at home is a waste of time They claim that good restaurants are better and can make modern living easier and less stressful Do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Some people say that art eg painting music and poetry can be made by everyone whereas others believe that it can only be made by those with special ability Discuss both the view and give your opinion 73
- Some people say that government should not put money on building theaters and sports stadiums others argue that they should spend more in medical care and education Discuss both views and give your opinion 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of problems'.
Suggestion: lots of problems
...he help of it. Many times tourist faces lots of problem communicating and understanding the cul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ge needed. For instance, earlier people use to hire guides so that they can explore...
^^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... conversation with non- native speaker. To conclude, such applications play a ma...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96308724832 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92626877811 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56711409396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7756556235 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.642857143 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23400165235 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723926906684 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525012526886 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133983390247 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622699984059 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.