Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
No one can deny the important role of public transportation in the improvement of people's living standards. In this regard, people's opinions are divided as to the government should have a special vision toward improving public transportation or high possibility of internet access. It is my firm belief that governments should spend more attention on the internet compare with other aspects. For a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
My primary reason is that the improvement of internet access has a critical role in leading civilization toward modern society. With easy access to high internet every projects in cities run in the fast mechanism. Statistically, the fast speed network make a change in the performance of state's plan and project compare with cities in a low quality network. It is certainly clear, prepare strong networks and attention to it by governments has a great influence on making an electronic town.
Second, if leaders in different states extol worldwide network and spend more money to this area consequently, the average of professional and educational persons rise up and the level of society transfer to a better position. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own experience. When I was a teenager I can't find someone skillful in various aspects and also I can't find great background in an easy way to improve my self. But today everything changes and most people have different skills with the help of internet. As you can see, if the network will be more wide and accessible in the future, every man and woman can be more professional than before.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I definitely think that the role of network in any community is so essential not only from a perspective about individual improvement but also from transfer toward a modern town.
- The reading passage states that many frog species around the world have declined in numbers due to changes in their environment and the writer provided some solution for this problem However the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in t 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 73
- TPO 30 Integrated Writing Task 40
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do 70
- Do agree and disagree with the following statements Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...own experience. When I was a teenager I cant find someone skillful in various aspect...
^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... skillful in various aspects and also I cant find great background in an easy way to...
^^^^
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an easy way" with adverb for "easy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s and also I cant find great background in an easy way to improve my self. But today everythin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, second, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 316.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02215189873 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97825499312 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4831072055 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.357142857 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286490030558 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909883123404 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653136178524 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160799652414 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100566362077 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.