Some say that the most important thing about being rich is that one has the opportunity to help others.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that helping others is one of the most essential issues in human life. In my opinion, helping others is significantly important for a rich person. In this essay, I will discuss agreements and disagreements about this subject.
It is obvious that some people have a financial situation than is superior to others. I agree with the people who believe that assisting others is a virtuous behavior such that it causes experiencing a self-loving feeling for them when they assist deprived people. For instance, consider someone who cannot afford to buy a computer, while you think you have sufficient money, you may lend them some of them. Certainly, after doing that you will be proud of yourself because of being positively effective in that person's life.
However, helping poor people can be considered as a human value, it may bother them likewise, if it will be done inappropriately. Some people do not assist others in order to improve their situation, in fact, they do it to prove themselves or even to humiliate them by helping with disdain. One example of this behavior is lending money to others and then remind them for a while that had been poor and we had survived them. This kind of help can definitely irritate people and is not ethical. From my point of view, such a help is one of the most negative, annoying, and immoral deeds that a person can do.
In conclusion, helping other people can be considered a high value regarding humanity and morality, even though it may bother people if it is done in a wrong manner. Therefore the intent and quality of helping others are significantly important as well, as I think.
- Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 89
- Some say that the most important thing about being rich is that one has the opportunity to help others To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that development in technology causes environmental problems Other people believe that technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both sides of the argument and then give your opinion 56
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that benefi 84
- Some say that the most important thing about being rich is that one has the opportunity to help others To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 512, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...e of being positively effective in that persons life. However, helping poor people can...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong manner" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ough it may bother people if it is done in a wrong manner. Therefore the intent and quality of he...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...people if it is done in a wrong manner. Therefore the intent and quality of helping other...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78947368421 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69809275683 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529824561404 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6259900028 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281555639595 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10497156409 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563000956749 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183770370745 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445476695416 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.