Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays the technology is ruling the world with its innovations. Some people say that reading paper is better, as they need not spend extra time in watching unnecessary videos which will pop up while reading something important. As far as I'm concerned, I would like to prefer using electronic devices for a broader information. I would be eleborating my opinions hereunder.
First of all, the information available on electronic devices with the internet is always updated. Moreover, the information of all the countries in the world are available through e-books. For instance, I bought a book of anatomy for my final exams. The book which I bought was older edition and the questions I got in the paper was updated to the latest version. I was worried and could not answer them as I do not have an idea about those topics. Next time, I bought same book in electronic version and was updated. Finally, I gave my exam with flying colors. From this example, we can know that the importance of updated versions in studying and writing exams.
Secondly, electronic devices make appointments in our daily life very easy and avoid surplus paperwork in case of emergencies. These devices will also save time as we can check everything over the devices with minimal knowledge. This example is an experience from my own experience of life. I had to make a last-minute appointment for my surgery, as I was facing trouble with my illness. As soon as I contacted the hospital staff they sent be e-forms to fill over the phone and made an appointment for my treatment. Moreover, I was taken to the emergency room directly without wasting my time filling vivid forms. By this, we can assume that electronic devices are helpful in our life in making an important appointment and also saves time.
Finally, there are some advantages to reading paper materials. As they can concentrate on what they are doing, they can avoid distractions, they are not harmful to eyes, as electronic devices are due to their radiation and do not have an option of deletion. The information can be stored for many years and can be retrieved on use. But the benefits of reading paper materials will not outweigh the benefits of electronic devices.
All in all, by considering all the points into account, I vehemently assert that electronic devices are better than reading paper material for not only getting the updated information in all the fields but also we can make appointments online by saving time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-11 | ctoluwasedaniel | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | Huge Jackman | 76 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | Mithun Chandra Banik | 66 | view |
| 2021-03-20 | Attia Yaqoob | 70 | view |
| 2020-12-09 | Pravin s. jadhav | 60 | view |
- burning mirror 60
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 80
- government is implementing higher taxes on cigarettes 80
- In the United States medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms However there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which information about patients is stored in ele 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities Use sp 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... reading something important. As far as Im concerned, I would like to prefer using...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89099526066 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76868533282 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4990496981 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5833333333 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201008600939 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567562926185 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465394394076 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122552845539 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307866413176 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.