In recent years, many small local shops have closed because consumers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping. Is this a positive or a negative development?
In recent times, the pattern of shopping amongst the people has drastically changed. The local shops are eradicated from the market; and replaced by the large shopping malls in the public’s shopping preferences. Such a change has both bright and dark sides, which will discuss in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the mega malls are availing innumerable range of products to the customers and elevating their standards of living. Larger shopping centres are satisfying all the needs of the consumers at a single destination. Such a dynamic method of business is not only satisfying its customers, but also generating many employment opportunities. Moreover, the attractive discount offers are provoking many consumers. Hence, the customers and shopkeeper both are benefited. For example, the mega malls offer variety of goods at discounted rates, hence the people are benefited by having more goods in their limited budget. Thus, the large malls play vital role in improving the public lifestyle.
On the other hand, the declining local shops are portraying many serious threats to the society, such as weaker economy, unemployment and poverty. Although, the shopping malls are tempting for the buyers, the adverse effects of it are influencing the whole society. Overall, the mall culture is promoting materialism to the people. For instance, many handicraft, small scale businesses of rural regions of India have been disappearing due to the mall culture and materialism. Hence, the change in shopping patterns of the people has a detrimental effect on the domestic economy.
In conclusion, the shopping habits of the people are influenced by the large shopping malls, which consists of both positive and negative effects. The government has to form policies of the sustainable business opportunity for the small shops.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-27 | Radhika Chopra | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | whatever | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | ielts_tony | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-22 | padmaJ | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | Falaka14 | 73 | view |
- Planting trees is very important for the environment Some people says that trees should be planted in the vacant areas of cities and towns while other says housing facilities should be built instead Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some older people struggle with the use of modern electronic technology such as smartphones and computers What are the causes and propose a solution 61
- Some people believe it is better to raise children in the city while others consider countryside to be a more suitable choice Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT THE MAIN PURPOSE OF TELEVISION SHOULD BE 67
- Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ards of living. Larger shopping centres are satisfying all the needs of the consumers at a sin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun handicraft seems to be countable; consider using: 'many handicrafts'.
Suggestion: many handicrafts
...aterialism to the people. For instance, many handicraft, small scale businesses of rural region...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43706293706 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86426814073 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566433566434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 14.0 2.52805611222 554% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1312009943 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4705882353 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380780001278 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106276391639 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964558526404 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233114281839 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481720532033 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.