Company Top Level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions? Discuss
Recently, the phenomenon of taking employees suggestions and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of employees’ ideas is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that brain storming can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, top level authorities’ companies can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of company strategies, as well as company developments, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I as a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered high control companies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both leading company and powerful company apparently can be seen.
Within a realm of science, making a decision might increase the consequences of successful companies. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of companies’ requirements could relate to this reality that the demerits of decisions analysis pertain to making decisions management. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downside of staff motivations is correlated negatively with decision making strategies. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of critical decisions.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefit of making decision policies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of successful employees prove the significance of employees’ inspirations, but also pinpoint taking rewards implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-25 | sandeep.daksha@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | aidasadr | 85 | view |
- Companies use advertisement to influence people to buy things sometimes which they don t need Give your opinion 88
- What s global problems and how the government should solve them 85
- What s global problems and how the government should solve them 88
- The university will deduct the students scores for late assignments Opinion and solutions 80
- Students with degree earn high salary than who doesn t have Some say that they have to pay the full cost of their courses Give opinion 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87843137255 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36127618978 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662745098039 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9249373956 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.916666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222683377354 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650029417777 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578505920272 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112719415644 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197971666324 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.